|Here are the 3 propositions that New Yorkers will be voting on this Tuesday’s Election Day. Just in case you haven’t read them and/or made a decision on whether or not to approve or disapprove them, here they are:
PROPOSITION ONE: VOTE “NO”
Revising State’s Redistricting Procedure
Very poorly written and wouldn’t really solve the problems. We need redistricting reform but this doesn’t come close to solving the problem. We need to signal the NYS legislature this doesn’t cut it and to sit down and make some REAL reforms.
Permitting Electronic Distribution of State Legislative Bills
This proposition is about putting bills out digitally which I think makes all kinds of sense regarding paper waste, speed of getting the bill before legislators, and the enormous amount of time and money saved once the transition is put in place. It also makes the 3-day read rule easier to achieve.
The SMART SCHOOLS BOND ACT OF 2014
This proposition is a no-brainer. This money will further the socialist Common Core goals and money probably won’t be given to districts who have backed away from Common Core just like George W. Bush’s Race to the Top money was restricted. Throwing more money at a problem seldom works and it certainly hasn’t worked for education. Scores keep getting worse.
PROP 1 – VOTE NO
I hope this helps you to know the issues and be a more informed voter.
BELOW IS THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSITIONS:
Proposed Ballot Propositions
Below is a listing of the statewide ballot proposals which will be voted on at the General Election this year. A summary of each of the proposition appears below, along with a link to a file containing the question as it will appear on the ballot, the abstract summary as well as the full text of the resolution responsible for each proposal.
Proposal One – Revising State’s Redistricting Procedure
Abstract: The purpose of this proposal is to reform the process of establishing new state legislative and congressional district lines that the Constitution requires every 10 years. If the proposal is approved, a redistricting commission will be established to determine lines for legislative and congressional districts, subject to adoption of the commission?s plan by the Legislature and approval by the Governor. Under the current provisions of the Constitution, the Legislature is the entity responsible for establishing these lines.
The proposed amendment would amend sections 4 and 5 and add a new section 5-b to Article 3 of the State Constitution. The new section 5-b would establish a redistricting commission to determine lines for state legislative and congressional districts. Each decade beginning in 2020, a 10-member redistricting commission will be established. Eight members will be appointed by the four state legislative leaders and the remaining two members will be appointed by the eight legislatively-appointed members. These remaining two members cannot, in the preceding five years, have been enrolled in either of the two major political parties in New York State.
The proposed amendment would establish qualifications for the members of the commission. They must be registered to vote in New York. They cannot be the spouse of a statewide elected official, of a member of the United States Congress, or of a member of the State Legislature. They cannot be or have been within the preceding three years a member of the New York State Legislature, United States Congress, or a statewide elected official; a state officer or employee or a legislative employee; a lobbyist registered in New York; or a political party chairman. The proposed amendment would require that, to the extent practicable, appointments to the commission reflect the diversity of the residents of New York and result from consultation with outside groups.
The proposed amendment would establish principles to be applied in creating districts, which must be drawn consistently with the requirements of the federal and state constitutions and federal statutes. These principles include:
No district lines may result in the prohibited denial or abridgement of racial or language minority voting rights. Districts cannot be drawn to have the purpose of or result in the denial or abridgement of such rights.
To the extent practicable, districts must contain as nearly as may be an equal number of inhabitants. The commission must provide a specific public explanation for any deviation that exists.
Each district must consist of contiguous territory and be as compact in form as practicable.
Districts cannot be drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents or other particular candidates or political parties.
While preparing its redistricting plan, the commission must hold at least 12 public hearings throughout the state. The public must be notified of the hearings and be able to access and review the commission?s draft redistricting plans, relevant data, and related information before the first public hearing. The commission must report the findings of the public hearings to the Legislature when the commission submits its redistricting plan.
The proposed amendment would establish voting requirements for the commission. To send a redistricting plan to the Legislature, seven out of 10 commission members must approve a plan. If the Legislature is controlled by one party, then the seven favorable votes must include that of at least one member appointed by each of the four legislative leaders. If control of the Legislature is split between the two major political parties, then the seven votes must include that of at least one member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly and one member appointed by the Temporary President of the Senate. If seven members of the commission cannot agree on a redistricting plan, then the commission submits the plan or plans that received the most votes, along with a record of the votes taken.
The commission must submit its redistricting plan for the Assembly and the Senate in one bill and the Legislature must vote upon that single bill without amending it. If the plan does not pass the Legislature and get the Governor?s approval or a veto override, the commission must submit another plan. If the second plan does not pass the Legislature and get the Governor?s approval or a veto override, the Legislature can amend the second plan as it deems necessary. The Legislature?s amended plan must comply with the same principles the commission?s plan was subject to. When an amended plan is approved by the Legislature, it is presented to the Governor for action.
The proposed amendment would establish the following voting requirements for the Legislature to approve a redistricting plan:
If the Speaker of the Assembly and the Temporary President of the Senate belong to different political parties and the required commission members approved the redistricting plan submitted to the Legislature, then at least a majority of the members elected to each house of the Legislature must vote in favor of the plan to approve it.
If the Speaker of the Assembly and the Temporary President of the Senate belong to different political parties and the required commission members did not approve the redistricting plan or plans submitted to the Legislature, then at least 60% of the members elected to each house of the Legislature must vote in favor of a plan to approve it.
If the Speaker of the Assembly and the Temporary President of the Senate belong to the same political party, then at least 2/3 of the members elected to each house of the Legislature must vote in favor of a plan to approve it.
The proposed amendment would establish a 60-day deadline by which a court must decide a petition challenging an apportionment plan and would provide the Legislature with an opportunity to correct any legal problems that a court finds with a redistricting plan.
The proposed amendment would create a bi-partisan staff to perform the commission?s duties and would provide for appropriations for the commission?s expenses.
Proposal Two – Permitting Electronic Distribution of State Legislative Bills
Abstract: The purpose of this proposal is to allow electronic distribution of a state legislative bill to satisfy the constitutional requirement that a bill be printed and on the desks of state legislators at least three days before the Legislature votes on it. Under the current provisions of the Constitution, this requirement can only be satisfied by distribution of a physical printed copy.
The proposal would amend section 14 of Article 3 of the State Constitution. It would provide that a bill will be considered ?printed and upon the desks? of members of the Legislature if, first, it is set forth in a legible electronic format by electronic means, and, second, legislators are able to review the bill in the electronic format at their desks. The proposal would establish that a bill is set forth by ?electronic means? when it is sent between computers or other machines designed to send and receive information, the receiving legislators can print the bill if they choose, and the bill cannot be changed without leaving a record of the changes.
Proposal Three – The SMART SCHOOLS BOND ACT OF 2014
This proposal would allow the State to borrow up to two billion dollars ($2,000,000,000). This money would be expended on capital projects related to the design, planning, site acquisition, demolition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or acquisition or installation of equipment for the following types of projects:
To acquire learning technology equipment or facilities including, but not limited to,
To install high-speed broadband or wireless internet connectivity for schools and communities;
To construct, enhance, and modernize educational facilities to accommodate pre-kindergarten programs and provide instructional space to replace transportable classroom units; and
To install high-tech security features in school buildings and on school campuses.
The proposal also would allow the State to refund the debt to take advantage of lower interest rates if the opportunity arises. To accomplish this, the proposal authorizes the State Comptroller to issue additional state bonds in sums up to or exceeding the amount of the bonds initially issued to refund, to advance refund, or otherwise to repay part or all of such bonds prior to the scheduled dates of their maturity.